An Exposition of Kant’s, Arendt’s, and Mill’s Moral Philosophy Essay

An Exposition of Kants, Arendts, and factorys Moral PhilosophyImmanuel Kant adheres to Deontological ethics. His theory offers a view of exampleity based on the rationale of good will and transaction. According to him, people can perform good actions solely by good intentions without any considerations to consequences. In addition, one must stick to the laws and the categorical imperative in order to act in accordance with and from duty. Several other philosophers such as Hannah Arendt discuss Kants moral philosophy. In her case study The Accused and Duties of a Law-Abiding Citizen, Arendt examines how Adolf Eichmanns actions conformed to Kants moral precepts but also how they ran of afoul to his conception of duty. In contrast, John Stuart Mill adopts a teleological view of moral philosophy. He exposes his view of consequentialism and utilitarianism to argue that an action is mor whollyy right only to the extent that it maximizes the aggregate happiness of all parties involved regardless of the motive. In the present paper, I will expose Kants moral precepts and the importance of duty in his Deontological principles. Then, I will appraise Arendts report on Adolf Eichmann to analyze the ways in which his actions were in accordance to or against Kants moral philosophy. I will conclude my reciprocation with an evaluation of Mills approach to morality in order to examine the differences between his teleological philosophy and Kants ethical principles.Kants moral philosophy is based on the categorical imperative (CI), good will, and duty. According to the CI, it is an absolute necessity, a command that humans should accord with universalizable maxims to treat people as ends in themselves and exercise their will without any concerns ab... ... In conclusion, Kant, Arendt, and Mill hold different moralities. The three philosophers all have different ways to analyze and encompass ethical principles. They all base their views on varying concepts of morality. Ka nts deontological ethics is grounded on concepts of duty, the categorical imperative, and good will. Similarly, Arendt utilizes Kants categorical imperative and idea of duty to share her account of Adolf Eichmanns trial. She recognizes that even though Eichmann attempted to live according to a Kantian definition of duty, his behavior did not fit Kants moral precepts. Mill, contrastingly, holds a teleological philosophy and uses the concept of consequentialism and utilitarianism to argue against Kants morality. In any case, the three philosophers bring thoughtful ethical philosophical concepts which pull up stakes new ways to analyze moral conflicts.